LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY KAMA-1
Categories
- Garbage collection, sewage pumping / Territory cleaning
- Non-store retail / Other non-store retail
- General construction works / General construction works for the construction of other buildings and structures
Archival extract
| OGRN | 1055905042951 |
|---|---|
| TIN | 5914019684 |
| OKPO | 77011287 |
| OKATO | 57416557000 |
| Date of registration | April 20, 2005 |
| Registrar | Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region |
| Ownership type | Private property |
| Organizational and legal form | Limited liability companies |
| Authorized capital | 10 000 rub. |
| Director | Krivenko Alexander Grigorievich |
Mini-information about LLC "KAMA-1"
LLC "KAMA-1", date of registration - April 20, 2005, registrar - Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region. Full official name - LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY KAMA-1. Legal address: 618703, PERM region, DOBRYANKA, rp. POLAZNA, st. NEFTYANIKOV, 3. The main activity is: "Cleaning and similar activities". The company is also registered in such categories as: "Other retail trade outside stores", "Production of general construction works for the construction of other buildings and structures not included in other groups." Director - Krivenko Alexander Grigorievich. Legal form (OPF) - limited liability companies. The type of property is private property.
Contacts
Other companies in the region
"ZAPADNOURALSKY ENERGOTEHSNAB", LLC, BEREZNIKI
Wholesale of household electrical goods
618404, PERM Territory, BEREZNIKI, LENINA Ave. 1-5
"TECHCOMTRADE", LLC, PERM
Wholesale of timber, building materials and sanitary equipment
614990, PERM, highway KOSMONAVTOV 111-22
LIQV COM OGUP DSP "DOBRYANSKY"
Performance of general construction works for the construction of other buildings and structures not included in other groups
618740, PERM region, DOBRYANKA, st. GAYDAR 16-30
"R-44", OOO
614097, PERM, st. PODLESNAYA, 43
"ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL FIRM "KAMA-PROM", LLC
Wholesale of computers and peripherals
614002, PERM, st. FOUNTAIN, 2A
FL LLC "MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCTION RISKS", PERM
Retail trade of motor vehicles
614000, PERM, st. KLIMENKO, 1
MBU "KOCHEVO CENTRAL DISTRICT HOSPITAL", KOCHEVO
The activities of general hospitals and specialized
619320, PERM Territory, KOMI-PERMYATSKY Autonomous Okrug, KOCHEVSKY district, p. KOCHEVO, st. TITOVA, 24
"DESIGNER", LLC, PERM
Site preparation
614087, PERM, st. MALKOVA, 18
LIQV COM LLC URALTEHMONTAZHSTROY, PERM
Production of general construction works
614000, PERM, st. KIROVA, 34
HOA "HOUSE OF OFFICIALS"
Real estate management
614045, PERM, st. OKULOVA 6-27
"FININVEST", LLC, PERM
Other monetary intermediation
614025, PERM, st. PIKhTOVAYA, 37
"AZBUKA-93", LLC
Wholesale of stationery and stationery
614010, PERM, st. KLARA ZETKIN 2-20
"METALLPROEKTSERVICE", LLC, PERM
Wholesale of metals and metal ores
614064, PERM, st. IZHEVSKAYA, 12A
"INBURTEH", LLC
other ratailing
614990, PERM, st. OKULOVA, 80
"SOKOL", LLC
Iron ore mining
614000, PERM, st. KUIBYSHEVA, 37
- is a founder in 3 organizations.
The company with the full name "LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY "KAMA-1"" was registered on April 20, 2005 in the Perm Territory region at the legal address: 618703, Perm Territory, the city of Dobryanka, the urban-type settlement of Polazna, Neftyanikov Street, 3A, office 2.
The registrar "" assigned the company TIN 5914019684 PSRN 1055905042951. Registration number in the Pension Fund: 069010010417. Registration number in the FSS: 590061016459001.
Primary activity according to OKVED: 81.29.9. Additional activities according to OKVED: 42.99; 47.9; 52.21; 52.21.24.
Requisites
| OGRN | 1055905042951 |
| TIN | 5914019684 |
| checkpoint | 591401001 |
| Organizational and legal form (OPF) | Limited liability companies |
| Full name of the legal entity | LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY "KAMA-1" |
| Abbreviated name of the legal entity | LLC "KAMA-1" |
| Region | Perm region |
| Legal address | 618703, Perm Territory, city of Dobryanka, urban-type settlement Polazna, Neftchinikov street, building 3A, office 2 |
| Registrar | |
| Name | Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 17 for the Perm Territory, No. 5958 |
| Address | 614070, Perm Territory, Perm city, Gagarina blvd., 44 |
| Date of registration | 20.04.2005 |
| Date of assignment of OGRN | 20.04.2005 |
| Accounting in the Federal Tax Service | |
| Registration date | 09.06.2018 |
| Tax authority | Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 19 for the Perm Territory, No. 5948 |
| Information about registration in the FIU | |
| Registration number | 069010010417 |
| Date of registration | 20.04.2005 |
| Name of the territorial body | Office of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation (state institution) in the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 069010 |
| Information about registration in the FSS | |
| Registration number | 590061016459001 |
| Date of registration | 04.05.2005 |
| Name of the executive body | State institution - Perm regional branch of the Social Insurance Fund of the Russian Federation, No. 5900 |
OKVED codes
other information
History of changes in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities
- The date: 20.04.2005
UAH: 1055905042951
Tax authority:
Reason for the change: Creation of a legal entity
The documents:
- APPLICATION FOR THE STATE REGISTRATION OF A LEGAL ENTITY IN CREATION
- CHARTER OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY "KAMA-1"
- FOUNDATION AGREEMENT OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY "KAMA-1"
- PROTOCOL
- CHECK-ORDER - The date: 20.04.2005
UAH: 2055905042994
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region, No. 5914
Reason for the change: - The date: 11.05.2005
UAH: 2055905044039
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region, No. 5914
Reason for the change: Submission of information on the registration of a legal entity as an insurant in the executive body of the Social Insurance Fund of the Russian Federation - The date: 14.05.2005
UAH: 2055905044743
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region, No. 5914
Reason for the change: Submission of information on the registration of a legal entity as an insurer in the territorial body of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation - The date: 14.07.2005
UAH: 2055905049726
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Region, No. 5914
Reason for the change:
The documents:
- PROTOCOL - The date: 09.02.2006
UAH: 2065914003208
Tax authority:
Reason for the change: Submission of information on the registration of a legal entity with a tax authority - The date: 18.12.2006
UAH: 2065914025087
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 5914
Reason for the change: Changing the information about a legal entity contained in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities
The documents:
- APPLICATION ON INTRODUCING CHANGES TO THE INFORMATION ON THE LEGAL ENTITY IN THE UNIFIED STATE REGISTER OF LEGAL ENTITIES, NOT RELATED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF CHANGES IN THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS - The date: 16.01.2007
UAH: 2075914000930
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 5914
Reason for the change: Changing the information about a legal entity contained in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities
The documents:
- APPLICATION ON INTRODUCING CHANGES TO THE INFORMATION ON THE LEGAL ENTITY IN THE UNIFIED STATE REGISTER OF LEGAL ENTITIES, NOT RELATED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF CHANGES IN THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS
- PROTOCOL - The date: 16.01.2007
UAH: 2075914000941
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 5914
Reason for the change:
The documents:
- CHANGES TO THE CHARTER
- LIST OF CHANGES
- PAYMENT ORDER
- SOLUTION - The date: 29.09.2009
UAH: 2095914016372
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 5914
Reason for the change: State registration of changes made to the charter of a limited liability company in order to bring it into line with the provisions of Federal Law No. 312-FZ of December 30, 2008
The documents:
- APPLICATION FOR THE STATE REGISTRATION OF CHANGES INTO THE FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS OF A LEGAL ENTITY
- SOLUTION
- CHARTER
- CHECK-ORDER - The date: 06.11.2013
UAH: 2135914009526
Tax authority: Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Dobryanka, Perm Territory, No. 5914
Reason for the change: State registration of changes made to the constituent documents of a legal entity related to changes in information about the legal entity contained in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, based on an application
The documents:
- APPLICATION FOR THE STATE REGISTRATION OF CHANGES INTO THE FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS OF A LEGAL ENTITY
- CHARTER
- DECISION TO AMEND THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS
- PAYMENT ORDER - The date: 10.06.2018
UAH: 2185958630757
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 17 for the Perm Territory, No. 5958
Reason for the change: Submission of information on the registration of a legal entity with a tax authority - The date: 19.04.2019
UAH: 2195958378229
Tax authority: Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service No. 17 for the Perm Territory, No. 5958
Reason for the change: Changing the information about a legal entity contained in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities
The documents:
- P14001 STATEMENT ON CHANGING INFORMATION NOT RELATED TO CHANGES. INSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS (clause 2.1)
- COPY OF THE PASSPORT
- RECEIPT MFC
Legal address on the city map
Other organizations in the directory
- , Yekaterinburg - Liquidated
TIN: 6670286170, OGRN: 1106670007070
620062, Sverdlovsk region, Yekaterinburg, Generalskaya street, 3, office 442
General Director: Kulakova Anna Nizametdinovna - — Current
TIN: 273080326, OGRN: 1100280034832
452440, Republic of Bashkortostan, Nurimanovskiy district, Starobedeevo village, Central street, 51
Director: Yuzlekbaev Vadim Venerovich - , Moscow - Liquidated
TIN: 7719667477, OGRN: 1087746128843
105187, Moscow, Izmailovskoye highway, 71, E, office. 402
General Director: Kuvalaki Stepan Stepanovich - , St. Petersburg - Liquidated
TIN: 7838304377, OGRN: 1047855069350
191180, St. Petersburg, B. Kazachiy lane, 6, letter A, room 8N
General Director: Kravets Sergey Vladimirovich - , Novosibirsk region - Liquidated
TIN: 5413109136, OGRN: 1025405226285
633353, Novosibirsk region, Bolotninsky district, Barataevka village
Head: Morozova Galina Ivanovna - , Moscow — Active
TIN: 7701773474, OGRN: 1087746290500
115054, Moscow, Bakhrushina street, 19, building 1
General Director: Krivenkov Alexey Anatolyevich - , Tula - Liquidated
TIN: 7107086081, OGRN: 1047101141350
300024, Tula region, city of Tula, Turgenevskaya street, 50
Director: Viktor Viktorovich Labutin - , Irkutsk - Liquidated
TIN: 3810335201, OGRN: 1143850000095
664014, Irkutsk region, city of Irkutsk, Tolevaya street, house 4
Liquidator: Drozdova Maria Valentinovna - , Tikhvin - Liquidated
TIN: 4715012844, OGRN: 1024701850007
187555, Leningrad region, city of Tikhvin, microdistrict 5th, 30, apt. 48
Director: Safonova Olga Anatolyevna - , Blagoveshchensk - Liquidated
TIN: 2801179628, OGRN: 1122801011937
675000, Amur region, city of Blagoveshchensk, Gorky street, 240, bldg. 3, office 2
General Director: Tabakov Alexey Sergeevich
Procurement and tenders
SUPPLY OF MEDICAL DEVICES
FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY INSTITUTION "FEDERAL CENTER FOR NEUROSURGERY" OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (TYUMEN)
Russian Federation, 625000, Tyumen region, Tyumen city, STR 4 KM CHERVISHEVSKY TRAKT, 5
SUPPLY OF SANITARY EQUIPMENT AND CONSUMABLES
FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY INSTITUTION "INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS NAMED AFTER A.I. ALIKHANOV OF THE NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER "KURCHATOV INSTITUTE"
Russian Federation, 117218, Moscow, B. CHERYOMUSHKINSKAYA STR., 25
SUPPLY OF A SET OF CONSUMABLES FOR THE NEEDS OF KNRTU-KAI
FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION "KAZAN NATIONAL RESEARCH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY NAMED AFTER A.N. TUPOLEV-KAI"
Russian Federation, 420111, Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, STREET KARLA MARKSA, BUILDING 10
SUPPLY OF DENTAL MATERIALS FOR THE NEEDS OF GBUZ YAO "YAOSP"
STATE BUDGET HEALTH INSTITUTION OF THE YAROSLAVL REGION "YAROSLAVSK REGIONAL DENTAL POLYCLINIC"
Russian Federation, 150040, Yaroslavl region, Yaroslavl city, TCHAIKOVSKOGO STREET, 47
SUPPLY OF LABORATORY GLASSWARE
EXPERT-CRIMINALISTIC SERVICE - REGIONAL BRANCH OF THE CENTRAL EXPERT-CRIMINALISTIC CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT OF NIZHNY NOVGOROD
Russian Federation, 603104, Nizhny Novgorod region, Nizhny Novgorod city, MEDICAL STREET, BUILDING 24
SUPPLY OF SUBSTANCES (MOTHERWORT-XEROFORM) FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF MEDICINES ACCORDING TO EXTEMPORAL RECIPE TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL PHARMACY DIVISIONS OF GBUZ "TSLO DZM" IN 2020.
STATE BUDGETARY INSTITUTION OF HEALTH CARE OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW "CENTER FOR DRUG PROVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW"
Russian Federation, 127018, Moscow, STRELETSKAYA STREET, BUILDING 3/BUILDING 1
A little more than half a century ago, a nuclear explosion was carried out for the first time in the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Of course, few of the inhabitants of our republic know about this, since everything happened deep underground, the information was classified. Now, according to already open sources, it is known that on March 30, 1965, at 8 o'clock in the morning, pilot work was carried out for the first time in the world using an underground nuclear explosion. This happened at the operating Grachevsky field of the Ishimbayneft field (well No. 617), not far from the village of Novaya Kazanovka (40 kilometers from Meleuz and 45 kilometers from Ishimbay). Thus, fifty years ago, a new era of the Soviet peaceful nuclear program was opened.
The Grachevsky facility was named "Butan-1". It was a time when the scientists of the Soviet Union were actively looking for ways and methods of using atomic energy for peaceful purposes, that is, in the national economy of the country. Just remember the world's first atomic icebreaker "Lenin" with a nuclear power plant, launched on December 5, 1957 in Murmansk to serve the Northern Sea Route. This great success of Soviet science made it possible to expand the horizons and scope of scientific research in the field of nuclear energy and to carry it out in practice.
What actually happened half a century ago near Meleuz? In a well at a great depth (about 1.5 kilometers), a nuclear device was laid and detonated. At the same time, the cost of a nuclear charge, according to scientists today, was less than drilling an oil well. The declassified documents do not report on environmental consequences, however, the use of an atom for explosions underground, probably, could not do without any subsequent impact on the health of people and animals, in general, on the background radiation. It is possible that local above-ground pollution remained around the wells.
The question is: why were underground tests under Meleuz necessary? Experts say that the experimental explosion at the Grachevskoye field was carried out in order to intensify oil production. It can be assumed that scientists at an almost developed field, at the request of black gold miners, tried to break through with the help of an atomic explosion to deeper layers of the earth where oil was deposited. Data on the effectiveness of these works are not available in the open press. Science in this area has just begun to develop, it has come to the aid of industrial production, and it is not necessary that every experiment in one area or another be completed successfully and immediately give a great economic effect.
In total, five underground nuclear explosions were carried out near Meleuz: March 30, 1965 ("Butan-1"), June 10, 1965 ("Butan-2"), June 10, 1980 ("Butan-3" and "Butan-4") and October 30, 1984 ("Bhutan-5"). The depth of the laying of nuclear devices was 1375, 1350, 1400, 1390 and 1341 meters, respectively, and the power of explosions in TNT equivalent was 2.3; 7.6; 3.2; 3.2 and 2.3 kilotons.
In addition to these five nuclear explosions near Meleuz, two more were carried out - also in the south of our republic, but already under the names "Kama-2" (this happened on October 26, 1973 at a depth of 2026 meters, 40 kilometers west of Sterlitamak) and "Kama- 1" (July 8, 1974 at a depth of 2123 meters, 25 kilometers from Salavat). The press provides different information, but they differ little from each other. We have given in the article the parameters according to the data of the laboratory of hydrogeology and underground hydrodynamics of VNIPIPromtechnologii.
Projects labeled "Kama-1" and "Kama-2" were implemented separately from each other for completely different industrial enterprises, but according to the same principle, so the explosion at the Kama-2 facility occurred even almost a year earlier than on "Kame-1". They say that such serious scientific works were prepared very carefully in the country - for months, or even years. Too serious was the risk near the existing factories and large industrial cities. Old-timers of Sterlitamak confirm the fact of the explosion. They said that before detonating a nuclear charge in the well, all the inhabitants of the city were asked to leave the premises, apparently fearing the collapse of individual dilapidated industrial buildings, residential buildings and other structures. Of course, no one was explained the reasons for the temporary evacuation. Fortunately, the scientists calculated everything correctly, the explosives did their job flawlessly, so the destruction and human casualties were avoided. This is evidenced by the high appraisal of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Soviet government: the complex of nuclear underground works in the south of Bashkiria was awarded the State Prize of the USSR to a group of scientists and specialists. Their names have not yet been revealed. The point is not in them. Scientists never determine the policy in the country - they only carry out the state order.
Since the explosions near Sterlitamak and Salavat were more powerful, they did not regret the TNT - they spent 10 kilotons each. As a result, at a depth of 2000 meters, huge underground storage facilities for biologically harmful waste from petrochemical industries were formed at two giant plants of the republic - the Sterlitamak soda-cement plant (now Soda OJSC) and the Salavat petrochemical plant (Gazprom neftekhim Salavat OJSC). By the way, the Belaya River flows only 40 kilometers from these objects. For the powerful development of the economy, scientific and technological progress seriously have to pay. There is still no alternative yet. Created in the mid-1970s, man-made underground tanks near Sterlitamak and Salavat are still in operation, as the city-forming petrochemical enterprises continue to produce products. If these enterprises are closed, tens of thousands of people will be unemployed, and the cities will sit without taxes, with all the ensuing consequences. It's a vicious circle...
The head of the laboratory of hydrogeology and underground hydrodynamics of the All-Russian Research and Design Institute of Industrial Technologies (VNIPIPromtekhnologii) Nikolay Prikhodko, by the way, who participated in the implementation of the Kama-1 and Kama-2 projects from the very beginning, last year gave such soothing comment: "If properly operated, underground storage facilities for industrial waste do not pose any danger to the population."
According to the data published in the monograph "Modern radioecological situation at the sites of peaceful nuclear explosions on the territory of the Russian Federation" (2005), in total in 1965-1988, according to the state program No. 7 "Nuclear explosions for the national economy" approved by the Council of Ministers of the USSR, RSFSR, work was carried out in Buryatia, Kalmykia, Komi ASSR, Yakutia, Arkhangelsk, Astrakhan, Ivanovo, Irkutsk, Kemerovo, Murmansk, Orenburg, Perm, Tyumen regions, Krasnoyarsk and Stavropol territories, Nenets, Yamalo-Nenets and Khanty-Mansiysk autonomous regions. In total, 124 nuclear explosions were carried out in the USSR for peaceful purposes: 82 - on the territory of the RSFSR, 38 - in Kazakhstan, 2 - in Uzbekistan, one each - in Turkmenistan and Ukraine. At the same time, 117 explosions out of 124 were carried out outside the borders of nuclear test sites. And only two explosions ("Globus-1" in the Ivanovo region and "Kraton-3" in Yakutia) were accompanied by accidents in which radioactive decay products leaked.
Underground explosions in our country were carried out, of course, in the interests of strengthening the defense capability and developing the national economy on orders from many allied ministries - geology, gas, oil, oil refining and petrochemical industries, medium machine building, geology, land reclamation and water management, for the production of mineral fertilizers. Since 1986, a moratorium has been imposed on any nuclear explosions. However, this ban, as usual with us, remained only on paper. The last explosion took place in 1988. Apparently, they decided to complete the previously planned projects in full and recoup the financial costs already invested in new experiments.
Rashit AYUPOV.
Huge underground storage facilities for industrial wastewater are widespread throughout the world, which should be taken for granted. For example, in Russia they are also located in the Tomsk, Ulyanovsk, Kirov, Orenburg and Volgograd regions and the Krasnoyarsk Territory. The United States has a lot of wells for pumping industrial waste, and European countries have a few less. The underground method of disposal of petrochemical waste is very common, but there are only two wells in the world enlarged as a result of an underground explosion - "Kama-1" and "Kama-2".
In the 1960s, underground nuclear explosions were carried out in Bashkiria. One of the facilities created as a result of them - Kama-1 - is now used by OAO Gazprom Neftekhim Salavat to store its industrial effluents, and the Kama-2 facility located near Sterlitamak is operated by OAO Bashkir Soda Company. Local environmentalists and bloggers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the operation of these facilities. One of the creators of these facilities spoke about what Kama-1 and Kama-2 are in reality, whether man-made accidents are possible there, and how dangerous they are for the local population. , Head of the Laboratory of Hydrogeology and Underground Hydrodynamics of the All-Russian Research and Design Institute of Industrial Technologies (VNIPIPromtekhnologii) Nikolai Prikhodko.Nikolai Korneevich, for what purposes were underground nuclear explosions carried out in Bashkiria? Were they scientific studies or military experiments?
In Soviet times, there was a special program N7, approved by the government of the USSR. It provided for the use of underground nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes in various areas of mining. For example, to silence gas fountains that could not be extinguished in the usual way. So at one time five gas fountains were extinguished. Explosions were also carried out to increase oil and gas production, crushing ores, creating underground storage facilities for gas condensate and gas, underground disposal of industrial wastewater and deep seismic sounding of the Earth. Based on the results of such studies, a number of deposits were later discovered.
- Have similar underground nuclear explosions been carried out in other regions of the country?
Underground nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes were carried out not only in Bashkiria. In total, 124 such explosions were carried out in the USSR. Of these, 82 - in Russia, 38 - in Kazakhstan, 2 - in Uzbekistan and one each - in Turkmenistan and Ukraine. In particular, two facilities for underground disposal of industrial waste, identical in technology and design, appeared in Bashkiria. The object "Kama-1" is located 25 km from the city of Salavat, and "Kama-2" - 40 km from Sterlitamak.
- Why were nuclear explosions used to create special facilities?
In those years, the Ministry of Chemical Industry applied to the Ministry of Atomic Industry with a request to build two facilities for industrial waste disposal. It was impossible to bury them through conventional wells, since industrial wastewater contains a large amount of suspended particles. In turn, an underground nuclear explosion improves the capacitive and filtration properties of rocks. The well can accept more wastewater.
Some imagine that the pumping of effluent occurs into the cavity formed by the explosion. But this is absolutely not true. Accepts stocks layer. The so-called injectivity (a characteristic indicating the possibility of injection - IF) of the well is simply improving. As a result of the explosion, a cavity is actually formed, which is then filled with rock fragments under rock pressure - the so-called collapse column. It has voids and cracks that make it easier to work with the well.
In the collapse column, an inter-clastic space is formed, where suspended particles accumulate. That is, they do not go into the reservoir, so the well works for a long time without the need for acid treatments and recovery. Unlike a conventional well, which quickly loses its productivity due to sedimentation.
- What volumes of industrial effluents are discharged by enterprises into underground storage facilities?
Currently, Kama-2 is pumping 4,000 cubic meters of industrial waste per day. In total, about 40 million cubic meters of industrial waste were pumped there. Can you imagine if all of them were dumped into the nearby Belaya River?
Approximately 4 million cubic meters have been pumped into Kama-1. Now 700 cubic meters per day are pumped. But these effluents are more toxic due to the fact that they are waste products from the production of heptyl, an integral part of rocket fuel. At first, they tried to dump industrial waste with heptyl into treatment facilities, but the bacteria that were there immediately died. Therefore, it was decided to build this facility.
- Are there other underground storage facilities for industrial waste in Russia and abroad?
Underground disposal of industrial effluents is widespread both in our country and abroad. In our country, they are provided for by the law on underground resources, and there are, for example, in the Tomsk, Ulyanovsk, Kirov, Orenburg and Volgograd regions, the Krasnoyarsk Territory. There are a lot of wells for pumping industrial waste in the USA, in Europe there are a few less. That is, this method of burial is very common. But there are only two wells enlarged as a result of an underground explosion - "Kama-1" and "Kama-2". When used correctly, they do not pose any danger to the public.
What is happening now with the objects "Kama-1" and "Kama-2". Who watches over them, who guards them? Is it possible for a stranger to get in there?
Both objects are working. As for the security, everything is in order with her. The requirements for the protection of these objects are serious. So, for example, the territory of the Kama-2 facility is fenced with barbed wire, there is a gate for entry, on which a combination lock is installed. A burglar alarm is switched on along the entire perimeter, which, in case of unauthorized entry, emits a sound and light signal. That is, no one will go there unnoticed. Operators also have a panic button, and the company has an agreement with private security to prevent cases of illegal intrusion. But for 40 years there were no such incidents, no one tried to penetrate. You can get there only with the permission of the enterprise. The enterprise itself, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and rescuers control the security and safety of the facility.
- And who monitors the radiation safety of the territory?
If we are talking about the Kama-2 facility, then the enterprise itself (Bashkir Soda Company) has a laboratory with the appropriate accreditation. Its specialists regularly visit the facility and check the state of the radiation situation at the industrial site.
In addition, once every five or six years, not only the site itself, but also its surroundings are checked. Specialists take soil and water samples, as well as collect plant samples. Then the laboratories analyze the content of radionuclides in these samples and specimens.
Such studies were carried out by the laboratory of our institute. But since we are the authors of the project, we have recently invited other specialists. For example, Ecogeoservice LLC from Tyumen.
- Are the results of such studies published? Are they available to those who want to see?
The results of these studies and checks are presented in reports, which are then sent to the enterprises. This data is not secret. Of course, they are not posted on the Internet, but interested people can get them if they wish.
- On what basis are these objects used? Is any permit required?
Naturally, it is impossible to simply download industrial stocks. To do this, a project is being created, which provides a rationale for the possibility, expediency and safety of the operation of the disposal facility for these industrial wastes. Relevant documents are considered by the state commission on mineral reserves, which makes an expert opinion and submits it to Roskomprirodnadzor. In turn, Roskomprirodnadzor issues a license, which indicates how long the facility can operate.
The projects "Kama-1" and "Kama-2" were developed by our institute. The laboratory, which I head, supervises these objects: we regularly go out for research, prepare reports and transfer them to the customer enterprise. Geophysicists from an enterprise that also has the appropriate license work with us. They take measurements in wells. The results of their research are also included in the report.
I started participating in such projects back in the 1970s when the first wells were being drilled. I devoted the most time to "Kame-1" and "Kame-2", since I have been the scientific supervisor for these objects from the very beginning. And therefore, it can be said that he is the most informed on these issues.
- "Bashkir Soda Company" places distiller's liquid in the underground storage. What is it and how dangerous can it be?
This distilling liquid is industrial effluents. They are a mineralized liquid containing sodium, calcium, and chloride ions. In terms of its qualitative composition, the still liquid is similar to formation water, only our effluents are less mineralized (the concentration of metal ions and chlorides in them is lower - IF). In addition, formation waters contain toxic sulfur compounds. As a result, when we pump soda industrial wastewater, the reservoir waters become even less toxic, because they are diluted with this still liquid.
But it is still impossible to dump this liquid into the river, because, compared to ordinary water, the mineralization in the drains is increased, and the fish will die. In addition, such water, due to its high salinity, is of little use even for technical needs.
- What will happen to the objects after the end of their useful life?
The wells must be properly cemented and special plugs placed on them. There are strict regulations according to which these facilities must be closed. The land plot itself after the liquidation of the well can be put into operation for other production needs. Oil and gas wells are liquidated in the same way.
- Is there a possibility of industrial effluents from the above facilities entering the water intake?
I read reviews on the Internet, after which a strange impression arises. Some, for example, write that the resource of the facilities is almost exhausted, they allegedly will soon overflow, industrial waste will fall into the rivers Belaya, Kama, Volga and the Caspian Sea, and the territory of Bashkiria will turn into a lifeless space. On the one hand it's funny, on the other it's sad. It's sad that some people can believe this.
I will try to explain popularly, without resorting to scientific terms. How can they get into the rivers and reach the Caspian Sea? People perceive underground storages as ground reservoirs that can overflow, and the water from there will pour out into the river. The physics is completely different there. When we pump industrial waste into the storage, there is a certain pressure at the wellhead. After the injection is stopped, the pressure drops rapidly within a few days. If you suddenly want to put industrial waste into the Belaya River, then you need to immerse the pump in the well, pump out the waste and send it to the Belaya. I hope no one does this.
They can answer me: you pumped industrial waste underground, they will pass along the working horizon and go to Belaya. But the depth of the river is not more than 50 meters, and the working horizon is at a depth of over 2 thousand meters. It won't work either.
That's also why industrial waste will not get into the river... The radius of the mining allotment at Kama-2 is 2.3 thousand meters. Further than it, industrial stocks will not go. Meanwhile, the distance to Belaya is 40 km.
Someone may object and quite rightly: "You are pumping at high pressure, and suddenly your valve has been torn off, the flanges have been pierced (the part connecting the pipes - IF), and industrial waste will begin to pour out?" Such a case is possible. But, when the project is developed, all possible options are provided.
Firstly, the fittings on the well are installed with a large margin. Secondly, as I said, during pumping, the pressure drops rapidly. With a breakthrough, the pressure will drop, and the amount of liquid that has poured out can be calculated. In accordance with them, embankment was made at the industrial sites "Kamy-2" and "Kamy-1". So the spilled liquid will remain within the embankment at the industrial site, and not in the Belaya River. When the pressure drops to zero, the wellhead will be repaired and all the outflowing industrial waste will be pumped back into it.
Have similar incidents already happened?
It didn't happen. True, information is circulating on the Internet, allegedly there was a release on Kama-1 in 2002. Indeed, there was a case when during drilling there was an outpouring of formation fluid containing radionuclides onto the surface. Any technology, especially the more complex one, requires a high production culture. Drillers were to some extent to blame for its violation. They drilled at night, although it was forbidden, and lowered the level of drilling fluid in the well. The pressure in the reservoir became greater than the pressure of the drilling fluid column, and it came out. But it was not 2002, but November 1974.
As a result of the release, no one received overdose of radiation. After that, it was necessary to decontaminate the industrial site and pump the spilled liquid back. The soil was covered with appropriate soil. Since then, the radiation level at this facility has been 50-60 micro-roentgens per hour, the background is considered normal up to 30 micro-roentgens per hour. But that doesn't mean anything. If you approach any monument or building lined with granite, the radiation background will be 60-70 microroentgen per hour.
- That is, the rumors about 1000 micro-roentgens per hour at these facilities are just rumors?
I read on the Internet about how people approached the object, measured 100, and then 1000 microroentgen per hour and fled. I don't know where it was measured. Of the experts who measured the level of radiation at the facilities, no one fled. On "Kame-2" the radiation background is also normal.
One of the local environmentalists also wrote on the Internet that a number of his relatives fell ill with cancer and died. You can understand and sympathize. In recent years, not only in our country, but also in other countries, the number of cancers has increased. But the ecologist himself connects this with radiation.
Let's reason. "Kama-2" is located 40 km from Sterlitamak. There is a normal radiation background at the facility, and even more so in Sterlitamak. If anyone could get sick from radiation, then these are the operators who work on "Kame-2" and on "Kame-1". But I do not know of a single case (and God forbid that it continues to be so) that someone at these facilities fell ill with cancer. Moreover, employees hold their places. They work and they like it there.
I have been to peaceful nuclear explosions. There is no need to talk seriously about radiation there. But I am also one of the liquidators of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Went there every quarter for several days and weeks for three years. What kind of radiation is there, I think, it is not necessary to tell. Now I am 78 years old, I continue to work, I hope to continue further.
Cancer can be caused by many things: water and air pollution, and the food a person eats. It is not known, for example, how products containing GMOs affect the body. And it is necessary to take the causes of the disease in a complex, it is wrong to connect them directly.
Speaking about me, I myself was born in Bashkiria, it is my small homeland. Graduated from the Oil Institute in Ufa with a degree in Mining Engineer for the Development and Operation of Oil and Gas Fields. For several years he worked at the Tuymazinsky oil field. I have many relatives in the republic: they live in Meleuz, Kumertau and Salavat. In Salavat, my relatives work at a petrochemical plant. Naturally, I am not interested in the deterioration of the ecological situation in the region.
- In general, who can conduct an independent expert assessment of these objects?
Expert assessment of the Kama-1 and Kama-2 facilities can be carried out by specialists who are well-versed in well drilling, hydrogeology, geology, underground hydrodynamics and it is good that they have experience in this area.
It is desirable that this be discussed with those who developed the projects, there was a discussion. The analysis should be done by specialists in this field, otherwise it may turn out to be frivolous.
This is not the first time I have heard comments and criticism of our facilities. But what I noticed is that it is often timed to coincide with the time of the next elections. A person wanted to become a deputy and he needs to come out with something to the population. It is right, of course, to come up with a real and well-developed proposal that solves a problem. But for this you need to have deep knowledge. And it is much easier to act as a critic, an active defender of the people and nature. Among the deputies there are worthy people, but there are also those who solve their personal issues and realize their ambitions.
I'll make one more guess. Soda is produced not only in Sterlitamak, but also in a number of foreign countries that surround us. I won't name them on purpose. Foreign enterprises would like to sell soda to Russia, maybe even cheaper. But for this it is necessary that Sterlitamak does not produce soda. When this happens, soda may cost less, or it may rise in price so that it doesn’t seem like a little.
There is such an example, by the way. The Americans bought up a number of soda plants in Brazil in order to modernize them, and after a while they closed them altogether. Now Brazil buys soda from the US. It is possible that we also have a lobby that pours water on the "mill" of foreign firms interested in closing production in Bashkiria.
