Are you a responsible person, is it possible to rely on you, or do colleagues and superiors consider you not a very reliable employee? If you answer the questions on this test honestly, you will probably find out what other people think of you.

1. After returning from vacation, you find that the person who replaced you has made a lot of mistakes and confused everything. You...

a) silently correct mistakes, believing that there is no need to offend someone;

b) go to the authorities and declare that the mistakes were not made by you, therefore you have nothing to do with poor work;

c) call your deputy for a conversation, then go with him to sort it out to the authorities.

2. You promised your colleague your help in solving some problem, but you forgot about it and...

a) pretend that you did not promise anything to anyone;

b) apologize and say that you will definitely keep your promise;

c) declare that you are swamped with things and cannot remember everything in the world.

3. You were invited to visit a colleague. Suddenly a friend came to you. You...

a) call a colleague, apologize and say that you cannot come;

b) go with a friend (girlfriend);

c) in spite of everything, you will still go to visit the person who invited you.

4. Overslept, you were late for work. Your actions...

a) carefully slip into the office, hoping that the authorities will not notice your lateness. If you do notice, honestly admit that you overslept;

b) try to come up with some plausible story that justifies your delay (someone close to you got sick, the bus broke down, etc.);

c) Call your boss from home and let them know you're late.

5. Do you work overtime?

a) yes, if necessary;

b) yes, but then you definitely demand a day off;

c) no, if you have not completed something, then leave it for the next day.

6. The boss is on a business trip, your immediate supervisor suddenly fell ill. However, an urgent matter must be completed, and there is no one else to do it except you. You...

a) you are nervous, afraid that you will make mistakes, so you wait until one of your superiors appears at work;

b) take everything into your own hands and start doing this business;

c) you won’t even think about it: this is not within your authority.

Calculate the number of points using the table.

9-12 points. You can be relied upon, and the authorities appreciate it. You are able to control the situation, are independent and can act and make decisions without instructions from the boss. It is not difficult for you to calculate all the consequences of your own actions. Just do not boast of your responsibility to others, behave modestly and calmly, do not emphasize that you are more capable than others. In any team there will always be envious people.

5-8 points. You are a good, executive worker, however, if you need to take responsibility, make an independent decision, you become uncomfortable. You are afraid because you are not sure of your capabilities, business abilities and professional skills. You are afraid to take risks, but it is known that those who do not work do not make mistakes. If you become a more confident and determined person, you will achieve a lot. 0-4 points. Bosses and colleagues do not consider you a responsible person. You are not assigned important tasks, because you can fail everything. If you want to change your opinion about yourself, try to offer your colleagues your help more often, even if you need to do very uninteresting, routine work. This will show that you want to work in a team, and you will be more trusted, and you will gain more self-confidence. Here are selected tests for non-professional use. Anyone can independently test themselves using these tests. The results obtained from these tests should not be taken too seriously. However, they are good for expanding "inner horizons", developing self-criticism, a source of ideas for self-improvement. Polish doctors from the Institute of National Health, together with graphologists and psychologists, developed a test to determine a person's propensity for certain diseases by handwriting. Do you tend to plan your time and not be at the mercy of external circumstances. The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify the level of honesty, openness of the subject. Designed for professional psychological diagnostics. The "Honesty" questionnaire goes well with those questionnaires that do not include a scale of lies: with low scores, Square, triangle, rectangle, circle, zigzag - diligence, leadership, transition, harmony, creativity. Equal or unequal union. Many of us, well-versed in ourselves people, are able to assess the degree of our activity and show it in accordance with our own potential. At the same time, many people who are endowed by nature with great vital activity, but do not realize it and do not even know about its existence. Anancast has a powerful force of unjustified resistance to circumstances. Instead of adapting to them, he tries at all costs to keep them unchanged. But in life everything changes, much in it is relative or does not matter at all for the existence of a person. Diagnosis of propensity to artistic professions. Diagnostics of the general psychological climate in the family. Prudent people love comfort, before they do something, they "measure seven times." Others rush through life at breakneck speed: they don't care! They are able to risk everything, even if the success of the enterprise is not guaranteed. If you are a girl or a young woman who sometimes finds it very difficult to figure out her feelings for another person ( young man), then let's hope that this test, developed by Professor Kovalev, will help you sort out your feelings to some extent. This test will help for introspection in determining the nature of the relationship with your spouse. Irritability. How important is sex and related things to you and your life? Evaluate each five years of your life according to the degree of saturation with important events for you. Aggressive or peaceful. If the number of points matches your age, then everything is in order. For those who prefer creative activity, it is desirable that the psychological age is not ahead of the passport one. Do you have a significant creative potential, which presents you with a rich selection of possibilities. If you can actually apply your abilities, then a wide variety of forms of creativity are available to you. Choleric. Sanguine. Phlegmatic person. Melancholic. The level of general communicative tolerance is evidenced by the fact that you do not know how, or do not want to understand or accept the individuality of other people. The individuality of another is, first of all, what is special in him: given by nature, brought up, learned in the environment. Veiled cruelty in relation to people, in judgments about them. Open cruelty in relation to people. Justified negativism in judgments about people. Grumbling, that is, the tendency to make unreasonable generalizations of negative facts in the field of relationships with partners and in observing social reality. ... Exhibitionism, homosexuality, masochism, sadism, polygamy, perversion, animalism, narcissism, voyeurism. Test for women. Bodily health. Well-being. Relationships with friends are very important. And what are yours? Some experts say that you can learn a lot about each of us from the initials. Unbalance. Excitability. Some people find it very difficult to look at themselves from the outside. It seems to many that they are "darlings", they are pleasant in communication, it is pleasant for interlocutors to talk. In fact, it often happens that we underestimate the feelings of our neighbor, are rude and insult, without noticing it ourselves. This test (the so-called Leary questionnaire) is very popular among professional psychologists for ease of use and information content. Try it out for yourself as well. There are people who are always on the alert - nothing can surprise them, stun them, confuse them. Their opposite is scattered and inattentive people, lost in the simplest situations. The purpose of this test is to help deal with inner feelings. The main idea of ​​the test is to find the key word that will help unravel the tangle of a person's pressing problems. Keyword - this is just the end of the thread, which you need to grab onto in order to unravel the tangle of problems. This test was developed by English psychologists. It will help you figure out how stingy you are with gifts. Are you kind and considerate to others? Are you able to give the last shirt to someone who needs it more? What is the dominance of the organization in which you work, male or female? To find out, just answer a few questions. Your dominant psychological defense strategy in dealing with partners. level of neuroticism. Are you the kind of woman from whom men can lose their heads? Shyness. Introspection of the manner of laughing. What is your management style: directive, collegial or conniving. If you are a pedestrian, then this test is not for you. Otherwise, it will not hurt you to find out for yourself whether you are a good driver or not. The proposed test, compiled by a French psychologist, is at the same time an exercise that will allow parents to better understand the issues of raising boys and girls. Captain or passenger, leader or follower, leader or subordinate? Test for women. Contact people feel free in any company. They easily get acquainted with unfamiliar men. The level of conflict. Sixteen types of functional brain asymmetry. Amusement lover or not, hedonist or ascetic? There are eight types of love for a partner: affection, passionate love, formal, romantic, friendly, fatal, perfect love, no love (or very weak). With the help of this short test, you can determine what type of love you have with you. This test is widely used in America to diagnose the entrepreneurial streak. By wrinkles, one can judge a person's personality: joy, shyness, attention to detail, honesty, intelligence, good nature, disappointment, anxiety, aggressiveness, nervousness, surprise, indifference. Introspection of character. This table for evaluating husbands, candidates for husbands was proposed by American and Canadian sexologists. A worthy man must score at least 100 positive and no more than 45 negative points. Questionnaire aimed at self-assessment of observation. Are you a reliable person? Or is it not always possible to rely on you, are you somewhat, as they say, selfish? The methodology is for personal use only. It will help to identify people prone to fraud in your environment. What is independence? This is the ability to take responsibility at the right time, this is decisiveness combined with a sober approach. Can you attribute yourself to people who are ready to boast of their independence, self-sufficiency? "Who is looking for a treasure - rarely finds it. And who is not looking - never finds." It is persistent people who clearly see goals and stubbornly strive for them to achieve some kind of success in life. Is this perseverance enough for you? Unprofessional test to study the level of motivation for personal wealth. This test is designed to help you understand delicate matter Are you too self-confident person. With the help of this test, you can test your ideas about the character and behavior inherent in people of different sexes, knowledge of social stereotypes. Analysis of drawings that are made during boring meetings or just having nothing to do: different patterns in a notebook, on a piece of paper. This test will help you find out if you are really touchy, as you sometimes hear. Or you yourself are tolerance. The level of anxiety. Are you just a pessimist or a morbid pessimist? Are you a healthy optimist or unbridled frivolous? What is he, the father of the family? .. To know this better, the wife must answer 24 questions. A rational hypocrite or a violent libertine. Most people spend about 8 hours a day at work and communicate with their colleagues as much as with their families. Therefore, relationships with colleagues are an important element of human life. Bad relationships with colleagues can not only damage a career, business, but also unbalance any person for a very long time. This test for assessing stress resistance was developed by a psychologist medical center University of Boston. attitude towards current work. The likelihood of masturbation. The possibility of exhibitionism. Predisposition to deformed relationships with peers. A fighter for truth or an opportunist? Designed for self-testing. Assessment of own entrepreneurial abilities. Sometimes it is difficult for a person to look at himself from the outside. This test is designed to find out how pleasant you are in communication. In countries that pay close attention to the study of workaholism, such as Japan, the United States and Canada, semi-structured interviews are used to identify workaholism. One of these interviews is a questionnaire proposed by B. Killinger. It has long been noted that men and women are often very different in their behavior. The experiments of psychologists have shown that in the presence of other people these differences manifest themselves doubly. This is explained by the fact that we are used to playing roles, the roles of men and the roles of women. As Shakespeare used to say, "The whole world is a theater, and the people in it are actors." Do you know your role? Alert and meticulous, or dreamy and distracted? Self-analysis of the degree of jealousy. Are you decisive? Answer the test, and, probably, after that you can answer this question more boldly. The level of ambition and readiness for a career. Is there some manipulative tendency or have engrams become familiar to you on the emotional spectrum. Impulsiveness. Emotional excitability. Efficiency. Reproducibility of unreacted experiences. Increased hyperthymia usually leads to a non-critical manifestation of activity. A person claims more than knows, knows how and does, she strives to take on everything, criticize and teach everyone, tries to attract attention to herself at any cost. Excessive energy interferes with clear and logical thinking, so hyperthymia often "carries". The level of unmotivated anxiety. The test is intended for self-testing. Diagnoses the presence or absence of a syndrome of self-destruction, that is, a tendency to self-destruction, self-aggression, self-injury. Tendency to be depressed. Frustration tendency. Tendency to cyclothymia. Tendency to euphoria. Tendency to exaltation. This test was compiled by American doctors. I advise you to answer most sincerely, without prevarication. It should be especially noted that the results of this test are not a definitive "diagnosis". Maybe you need to change your lifestyle in some way. Sometimes it's good to be a tough leader. Here, however, a sober assessment of the peculiarities of the style of one's leadership and one's character is necessary. To help you with this self-assessment, American management experts have developed a simple but useful test. It is based on the thesis that every leader has two types of mental resources: D-resources and B-resources. ... The degree of tension in the relationship. The level of respect for the feelings of a partner. Ability to yield. The test is intended for self-testing. Do you have a true passion for travel or are you a homebody? The questionnaire is designed to identify the level of anxiety of a person in relation to their own mistakes. Indirectly, it also helps to judge the attitude to the opinions of others, the desire for objectivity, a tendency to self-deception and the use of psychological ones. Are you adamant and, excuse me, stubborn? Does the firmness of your convictions go well with the great subtlety and flexibility of your mind? According to Carl Gustav Jung, there are two ways to adapt to the world around you. One of them is expansion: constantly communicate, expand contacts, business ties, take everything that life gives. Such is the extrovert. Introverts, on the contrary, limit their contacts, withdraw into themselves, as if hiding in a shell. Very insecure, self-confident or overconfident? Questions for my husband. Questions for my wife. Are you a good diplomat? Do you lead the discussion in an authoritarian, overbearing and unceremonious manner? Your behavior does not receive an unambiguous assessment in the team?

Online performance test: Are you an executive subordinate?

comprises 10 questions| rating 4.0 out of 5 points

There are people who are at the helm of a firm, company or some other organization - these are leaders. And there are people who are good performers. Some shout: "Now, if I were the boss ...". Believe me, a person is incompetent in matters of leadership, diplomacy, etc. will not be able to manage the enterprise well. Therefore, just good and diligent employees are also valuable - everyone should be in their place. Perhaps, over time, working on yourself, you will become a good leader. But everything takes time. In the meantime, you can find out which of you is a subordinate ...
Is your boss satisfied with the performance of your work? Do you always complete your work on time?

Psychological test Are you an executive subordinate? You can go online completely free of charge (without registration and without sending SMS). If possible, leave your review and rate. Have a good testing!

Inna, can I get the name of your supervisor? And the department in which he defended himself and the school that he adheres to. Perhaps this way it will become more clear to me what is at stake ... In different schools, different positions are taken on what is meant by "personal qualities" and what is not.

As far as I remember, the locus of control technique (the level of subjective control) assessed "externality" and "internality", and the second name of this technique sounds like "Cognitive Orientation". Out of interest, I opened the annotation to the methodology (suddenly forgot something) there is not a word about any personal qualities - "the technique allows you to identify the orientation of the personality to external (external) or internal (internal) stimuli ...." Moreover, Rotter wrote about "social behavior” … And he researched the social behavior of the individual (and not the personality itself and personal qualities) and used the key concepts “behavioral potential”, “expectation”, “reinforcement”, “reinforcement value”, “psychological situation”, “locus of control”. Rotter studied behavior in the social context of cognitive factors... According to Rotter, human behavior is determined by the expectation that a given action will eventually lead to future rewards. He was interested in the "prediction of behavior" about personal qualities - not a word ... And his theory and methodology to personal qualities are not related - this is a different approach to the study and knowledge of man.

I didn’t have to work with the USC questionnaire, but it also seems to be about “externality” and “internality” ...

Thank you for giving definitions of the concepts of "responsibility" and "dutifulness". However, if you use the concepts of “everyday language”, you can make some kind of tool suitable only for yourself and for specific situations (that is, intuitive, situational and subjective - nothing more).

If we talk about some serious tool, then, in my opinion, it is necessary to do a preparatory study on a wide sample of people and from it to derive the meanings of "responsibility" and "dutifulness".

You write that “Responsibility implies that a person FORESEES THE RESULT OF HIS ACTIONS, and if this RESULT IS Dubious, then RESPONSIBLE for decision he himself will

I see 3 components in this formulation:
- cognitive (anticipation of the result, expectation of the result)
- evaluative, social (evaluation of the result, answer)
- behavioral (action, respond)

By the way, indeed, very similar to Rotter Bandura.

And I don't see anything personal about it. What you described (in my opinion) by "personality" questionnaires cannot be measured. We really need some situational stuff here...

I do not have such information, but you can try to raise the original research of Rotter and Bandura - what kind of experiments they conducted (when they created their theories) - maybe there are some interesting ideas will be...

As a delusion, the Rosenzweig technique came to my mind (more precisely, its form - drawn pictures-situations, the need to evaluate them and respond in the form of a written answer in free form). Maybe you can make such a test with drawn situations ... Or described situations (as in your example). But for this, you still need to type this array of situations described by different people and choose the most typical ones. Or you can go down the path of observation of behavior, as Robert suggested (create a "provocative" situation and see what happens). But this can be done for research purposes, and in practice it will hardly be applicable ...

But this (in my opinion) is very, very doubtful and it’s not at all clear what it is based on: “Responsibility always implies the meaningfulness of actions, diligence is easily limited by superficial awareness (hence the lack of criticality) ... To be honest, it’s not at all clear to me - what kind of then a play on words, behind which it is not clear what is ((((